Thai police have arrested Liang Ai-Bing, the alleged mastermind behind the Fintoch crypto scam, bringing a dramatic close to one of 2023’s most notorious DeFi frauds. Liang was detained in Bangkok on October 30 after a months-long joint operation between Thai and Chinese authorities. Officers also discovered an unlicensed firearm at his residence, and extradition to China is now being arranged.
The arrest revives memories of a project that promised investors the impossible, 1 percent daily returns, while hiding behind the credibility of global banking giant Morgan Stanley.
Inside the Fintoch Crypto Scam and Its 1%-a-Day Promise
Operating under the name Morgan DF Fintoch, the platform presented itself as a legitimate decentralized lending protocol. Its slick website and promotional videos showcased a supposed CEO, “Bob Lambert,” who later turned out to be an actor hired for marketing footage.
Fintoch positioned itself as a bridge between traditional finance and DeFi. It claimed deposits were “secured” by major banks and promised effortless passive income. However, in May 2023 withdrawals suddenly froze, and all communication channels went silent.
Soon after, wallets linked to Fintoch began emptying out. Singapore’s Monetary Authority (MAS) had already warned that the project was not authorized to operate, but by then many investors had already lost access to their funds.
>>> Read more: Operation Catalyst: Interpol’s Crackdown on Crypto Crime
How the Fintoch Crypto Scam Worked: From ROI Promises to Exit
Behind the glossy marketing front, Fintoch followed a familiar Ponzi playbook. New deposits funded older investors’ “profits,” while token liquidity and wallet transparency were intentionally obfuscated.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT documented how more than $31.6 million USDT moved from Binance Smart Chain through Tron and Ethereum networks in a single day, immediately after withdrawals were halted. ZachXBT’s Fintoch report became the first public forensic trace of the operation’s collapse.
These transactions were quickly split into smaller wallets, swapped into stablecoins, and passed through mixers. Meanwhile, victims speculated that the founder had fled abroad. Unfortunately, law enforcement had little to act on until Liang resurfaced in Thailand this month.
The Difference Between $14 Million and $31.6 Million Fintoch Losses
When Liang’s arrest made global headlines, a new confusion emerged: how much money was actually lost?
Some reports described $14 million (≈ ¥100 million) in victim complaints filed on the Chinese mainland. Others cited the $31.6 million USDT tracked on-chain during the exit. Both figures are accurate in context. They simply measure different aspects of the same scam.
The $31.6 million number reflects the total cryptocurrency outflows visible on public ledgers. In contrast, the $14 million figure stems from verified complaints by Chinese citizens who could document their losses to police. Because many victims outside China never filed claims, and because token prices fluctuate, totals diverge.
This mismatch highlights a persistent problem in crypto-crime reporting: regulatory filings record fiat losses, while on-chain data captures actual token movement. Understanding both sides gives a fuller picture of the damage.
The Fake Morgan Stanley Crypto Illusion
Fintoch’s success relied on more than greed: it depended on borrowed trust. The project’s branding mirrored Morgan Stanley’s logo, and its marketing claimed the bank had invested in the platform’s “smart-contract lending” product. None of it was true.
By the time fact-checkers exposed the ruse, thousands of users had already deposited their funds. The fake Morgan Stanley Fintoch crypto association remains one of the boldest identity-theft tactics seen in DeFi marketing.
Since then, similar ploys have surfaced, from “Citibank DeFi Yield” to “BlackRock AI Funds.” As a result, regulators are calling for stronger intellectual-property cooperation to deter such impersonations.
Warning Signs of Fake DeFi Projects Like Fintoch
The Fintoch Ponzi scheme shows how easily investors can mistake presentation for legitimacy. Recognizing the red flags early can prevent losses:
- Guaranteed ROI: Any platform promising fixed daily profits is mathematically unsustainable.
- Borrowed Branding: Always verify corporate partnerships through official press releases or regulator databases.
- Anonymous Leadership: Legitimate companies list real, verifiable executives.
- Opaque Token Flows: A lack of audits or whitepapers should immediately raise suspicion.
These warning signs of fake DeFi projects like Fintoch form a baseline checklist for anyone tempted by high-yield platforms.
Enforcement and Outlook
Liang Ai-Bing’s capture marks a notable shift in cross-border crypto enforcement across Southeast Asia. Thailand and China have collaborated on several financial-crime cases before, yet this is among the first where on-chain evidence directly supported an international arrest warrant.
Authorities believe Liang will face trial in China, where most victim complaints originated. Asset recovery remains uncertain, since much of the $31 million was likely laundered through unregistered exchanges. Even so, the cooperation between chain analysts, regulators, and law enforcement shows how digital forensics are now translating into real-world accountability.
>>> Read more: FinCEN Flags $3.9B in Crypto ATM Fraud, Urges Crackdown
Lessons from the Fintoch Crypto Scam
A scam that began with a fake Morgan Stanley banner has ended with a Bangkok arrest, but the broader lesson is sobering. In today’s tokenized markets, credibility can still be fabricated as easily as a logo.
For ordinary investors, the Fintoch crypto scam is a warning: even professional-looking DeFi projects can vanish overnight. Brand names, website polish, and daily-yield promises are no substitute for verifiable truth.
