TL;DR
- Nasdaq has implemented rule changes removing position limits on crypto ETF options, enabling uncapped options trading on Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.
- SEC has a limited 60-day window to intervene.
- The change reflects the normalization of crypto ETF options within existing U.S. derivatives rules.
Nasdaq, through several of its U.S. options exchanges, has submitted parallel rule change filings to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to remove Bitcoin ETF option limits. The filings, submitted by Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq BX, Nasdaq PHLX, and related entities, took effect in mid-January after the SEC waived its standard 30-day review period.
As a result, the existing caps on how many contracts market participants may hold or exercise have already been lifted in practice. The SEC, however, retains authority to suspend, modify, or reverse the changes within 60 days of filing, a window that runs into early March.
The rule changes do not introduce new crypto products. They focus solely on how options tied to already approved crypto exchange-traded funds operate within U.S. derivatives markets.
Why option limits were applied in the first place
Position and exercise caps are a common risk-management tool in options markets. They aim to prevent excessive concentration, reduce manipulation risk, and support orderly trading during early market phases. When crypto ETF options were first listed, regulators applied position limits on ETF options to reflect uncertainty around liquidity and participant behavior.
Those constraints provided safeguards during market formation, not as permanent features. Nasdaq now argues that the conditions that justified those limits no longer apply.
>>> Read more: BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Options Approved
Nasdaq’s case for removing the limits
In its filings, Nasdaq points to sustained growth in trading activity and market depth since spot crypto ETFs began trading. According to the exchange, options linked to these funds now display liquidity and participation profiles comparable to other established ETF options markets.
From Nasdaq’s perspective, Bitcoin ETF option limits have shifted from a risk control to a structural bottleneck. Removing them allows market makers and institutional participants to manage exposure more efficiently without altering the underlying regulatory framework.
The rule changes apply to both Bitcoin-based products and Ethereum ETF options, reflecting the broader scope of crypto ETF derivatives now active on U.S. exchanges.
Normalization through existing regulatory channels
The filings build on earlier SEC approvals, which already permit options trading on spot crypto ETFs. Nasdaq is not seeking to revisit those approvals. Instead, the exchanges are aligning crypto ETF options with the same rules that govern traditional ETF options.
In that context, lifting options limits on Bitcoin ETFs represents procedural normalization rather than deregulation. Crypto-linked options are being treated consistently with comparable derivatives tied to equities or commodity ETFs.
Expansion as a market consequence
Although regulatory in nature, the impact is tangible. Eliminating caps enables larger hedging positions, more flexible market-making strategies, and higher potential open interest. These changes expand how the products can be used, even though the products themselves were already live.
For participants active in Nasdaq crypto ETF options, the shift affects scale rather than access. Retail participation rules remain unchanged, and the underlying ETFs continue to trade under existing oversight.
What the rule changes do not affect
The filings do not alter the approval status of any crypto ETF. They do not change how spot Bitcoin or Ether markets are regulated. They also do not expand retail eligibility or signal a broader shift in crypto policy.
Instead, the changes focus narrowly on whether limits on Bitcoin ETF options remain appropriate given current liquidity and market structure. While the limits are no longer in force, the SEC maintains the ability to intervene during the statutory review window.
Regulatory status going forward
Because the SEC waived its initial review period, the rule changes are already effective. The agency may still suspend or revise them within 60 days of filing if concerns emerge. Absent such action, the rule changes removing Bitcoin ETF option limits are final.
The episode marks a further step in integrating crypto-linked derivatives into mainstream U.S. market infrastructure, without expanding the regulatory perimeter around digital assets themselves.
Readers’ frequently asked questions
Do the rule changes apply to all Bitcoin ETF options listed on Nasdaq?
The rule changes apply to Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF options listed on Nasdaq-operated options exchanges that submitted the filings, including Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq BX, and Nasdaq PHLX.
Are position limits fully eliminated, or can they be reinstated?
The limits are currently removed, but the SEC retains authority to suspend or modify the rule changes within 60 days of filing if regulatory concerns arise.
Does this change affect margin requirements or options eligibility?
No. The rule changes only address position and exercise limits. Margin rules, eligibility requirements, and options trading permissions remain unchanged.
What’s in it for you? Action items you might want to consider
Review hedging strategies involving crypto ETF options
If you trade or manage exposure to Bitcoin or Ethereum ETFs, reassess existing hedging strategies in light of the removal of position limits, which may allow greater flexibility in options positioning.
Monitor SEC actions during the review window
Although the rule changes are already effective, the SEC retains authority to intervene within 60 days of filing. Market participants should track any regulatory updates that could alter current trading conditions.
Evaluate liquidity and pricing changes in ETF options markets
With position caps removed, options liquidity and pricing dynamics may evolve. Traders and risk managers may want to observe changes in spreads, open interest, and market depth before adjusting exposure.








