In a significant regulatory action that could reshape the intersection between traditional banking and cryptocurrency, the U.S. Federal Reserve has issued a cease-and-desist order to United Texas Bank, demanding suspending its crypto-banking services. The order, issued on September 4, 2024, stems from “significant deficiencies” in the bank’s anti-money laundering (AML) compliance practices. Specifically, the Federal Reserve identified issues in the bank’s risk management and governance concerning virtual currency clients and foreign correspondent banking.
This move is part of a broader trend of increasing regulatory scrutiny on banks with crypto connections. Following the high-profile collapses of Silvergate and Signature Banks in 2023, both of which had strong ties to the cryptocurrency industry, the regulatory environment has grown more challenging for financial institutions that cater to digital asset businesses. As a result, many crypto firms have struggled to maintain reliable banking relationships, further intensifying concerns about access to essential financial services.
Regulatory Pressure and Compliance Failures
The Federal Reserve’s order demands that United Texas Bank submit a detailed action plan within 90 days to strengthen its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and AML regulations. This includes enhancing board oversight, improving customer due diligence, and monitoring suspicious activities. The bank has agreed to the order without initiating formal proceedings, signaling its willingness to address these issues.
The regulatory action follows a pattern seen earlier in the year. Then the Fed issued a similar enforcement against Customers Bank, another institution known for serving crypto clients. In that case, the deficiencies were also linked to the bank’s dealings with digital assets. These cases reflect a growing focus by regulators on ensuring that banks handling cryptocurrency transactions are equipped with robust compliance frameworks to mitigate the risks of money laundering and other illicit activities.
>>> Read more: Evolve Bank Under Fire After Synapse Bankruptcy
Shrinking Options for Crypto Firms
For the U.S. cryptocurrency industry, the regulatory crackdown on crypto-friendly banks is becoming a major pain point. The closures of Silvergate and Signature Bank left many crypto firms scrambling to find new banking partners. Now, the action against United Texas Bank further narrows those options, raising concerns that it may force digital asset companies to look offshore for banking solutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has previously warned about the risks that cryptocurrency deposits pose to traditional banks. They are concerned about liquidity and volatility. This has led several banks, including Metropolitan Bank, to scale back or entirely exit their crypto-related services. Such moves are part of a larger industry trend. Banks re-evaluate their exposure to the volatile cryptocurrency market, often perceived as a high-risk sector by regulators and traditional financial institutions.
Broader Implications for the Crypto-Banking Relationship
The Federal Reserve’s action against United Texas Bank is likely to have far-reaching implications for the relationship between the U.S. banking sector and the cryptocurrency industry. As regulatory pressures mount, crypto companies are finding fewer U.S.-based banks willing to provide them with essential financial services. Some experts warn, that if this trend continues, it may increasingly drive cryptocurrency firms to offshore banking solutions or non-traditional financial services. That would raise new risks around transparency and oversight.
This situation also highlights the tension between innovation in financial services and regulatory oversight. While cryptocurrency advocates argue that digital assets are a necessary part of the future of finance, regulators remain focused on ensuring that traditional financial institutions maintain robust compliance measures to protect against money laundering and other criminal activities. The result is a precarious balance between encouraging innovation and maintaining financial system integrity.
>>> Read more: Fed Action Against Customers Bancorp – Crypto at Crossroads?
The cease-and-desist order against the United Texas Bank is a critical moment for both the traditional banking and cryptocurrency sectors. As the regulatory landscape for digital assets continues to tighten, crypto firms are facing fewer banking options, a trend that could have significant implications for the future of the industry in the U.S. Whether this regulatory pressure will lead to more robust compliance frameworks or drive crypto businesses offshore remains an open question. What is clear, however, is that the relationship between banks and the crypto sector is under strain, and the outcome of this regulatory standoff will shape the future of crypto-banking in the U.S.
Readers’ frequently asked questions
Why is the Federal Reserve focusing on AML compliance specifically when it comes to crypto-related banking services?
The Federal Reserve, along with other financial regulators, places a high priority on anti-money laundering (AML) compliance due to the inherent risks associated with digital assets. Cryptocurrencies are often used for cross-border transactions. That can make them attractive for illegal activities like money laundering, terrorism financing, and fraud. Unlike traditional banking, cryptocurrencies operate in a largely decentralized manner, making tracking and regulating these transactions more difficult. The Fed’s focus on AML compliance is meant to ensure that banks, especially those serving crypto clients, have robust monitoring systems to detect suspicious activities and report them as required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). This action is also a preventative measure to protect the integrity of the financial system while crypto technologies continue to evolve.
Are other crypto-friendly banks at risk of facing similar regulatory action?
Yes, other crypto-friendly banks could face similar scrutiny and enforcement actions if regulators find them to have weak risk management or compliance protocols, especially concerning their cryptocurrency-related clients. The recent closure of banks like Silvergate and Signature, combined with the enforcement against Customers Bank earlier this year, suggests that regulators are closely monitoring banks that deal with digital assets. They expect these institutions to adhere strictly to AML and BSA regulations. Any lapses may result in similar cease-and-desist orders or other penalties. The trend indicates that regulators are trying to minimize risks in a sector that they believe could destabilize financial institutions, particularly amid the volatility and global reach of cryptocurrencies.
What options are available for cryptocurrency firms if more U.S. banks stop servicing them?
If U.S. banks continue to pull away from the crypto sector due to regulatory pressure, cryptocurrency firms may be forced to explore offshore banking options. They could turn to non-traditional financial services, such as fintech companies and digital payment providers, too. Some might also look to decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, which offer services outside traditional banking. However, relying on offshore or decentralized systems comes with its own risks. That includes reduced oversight and the potential for regulatory challenges in the future. Additionally, these alternatives may not provide the same level of financial stability or trust that established U.S. banks can offer. As a result, crypto firms could face increased operational challenges, higher costs, and added regulatory scrutiny when accessing banking services outside of the U.S.
What Is In It For You? Action Items You Might Want to Consider
Evaluate Your Banking Relationships
If you’re trading cryptocurrencies or running a crypto business, it’s essential to review your current banking arrangements. With the Federal Reserve increasing scrutiny on banks dealing with crypto, including the United Texas Bank, the risk of losing banking services is rising. Make sure your bank has strong compliance systems. Also, consider diversifying your banking partners to reduce exposure to a potential regulatory shutdown. It might be time to explore fintech options or banks outside the U.S. that cater to digital assets.
Prepare for Potential Regulatory Changes
Given the growing pressure on banks to tighten AML and compliance frameworks, traders should stay updated on how this could impact the broader market. Regulatory shifts may lead to sudden disruptions in liquidity if more banks reduce their exposure to crypto clients. Be ready to adjust your trading strategy by maintaining access to multiple financial channels, both traditional and digital, to ensure uninterrupted operations in case your primary banking service is affected.
Monitor the Crypto-Banking Landscape
Keep a close watch on developments in the crypto-banking ecosystem. Regulatory action against banks like United Texas Bank could signal further shifts in the market. Understanding how these changes could affect liquidity, deposit risks, and trading volumes will help you make informed decisions. Traders who stay informed and adaptable will be better positioned to respond to market shifts caused by these regulatory crackdowns.
